Well, all this is interesting to me, anyway, and that's what matters here. The Internet is a terrible thing for someone like me, who finds almost everything interesting.
Monday, May 9, 2011
Unwinding "hide the decline"
I think this is the clearest explanation of that 'hide the decline' crock I've ever seen. Global warming deniers picked one suspicious-sounding phrase out of thousands of stolen emails and tried to convince the uninformed that it was reason to deny all of the science.
In reality, of course, it was the kind of ill-chosen phrase anyone might use in a private email to someone else who knew exactly what he meant. There wasn't anything nefarious in it at all. It was just a convenient short-hand for a situation all climatologists understood.
Frankly, this just shows the dishonesty in the deniers' camp. If they didn't know this, it was because they didn't want to know, and didn't bother to ask. Well, why should they? Their goal is to discredit climatological science, not to actually find out the truth.
After all, what's more likely, that the consensus of climatologists is right or that some politician or pundit knows more about the science behind this than the people with the education, background, and experience who work professionally in this field?
When it comes to science, you can find pretty much any individual opinion about anything. But choosing what to believe that way is just believing what you want to believe. The only rational way to behave is to accept - provisionally, as all science is provisional - the current scientific consensus.
And that's just as true about global warming as it is about evolution or the age of the universe or that the Earth revolves around the Sun. You may wish the Earth was flat, but if you believe that, when the scientific consensus says otherwise, you're simply believing what you want to believe.
Anyway, this is a very clear explanation of that "hide the decline" "trick." Will this convince a true believer conspiracy enthusiast? Of course not. Nothing will convince a true believer conspiracy enthusiast.
But if you're still rational, this should show you not only why it's not the smoking gun of a scientific conspiracy, but also why you shouldn't believe such claims in the first place. Climatologists have worked, and continue to work, very hard at determining the truth. They may be wrong, but there's absolutely no better bet than to assume that the consensus of climatologists is right.
After all, in the unlikely event they are wrong, they'll be the first to discover that. And then the consensus will change (and my opinion will, too).
2 comments:
Anonymous
said...
A very well thought out and well presented argument. I confess that due to the amount of information/misinformation being spread on both sides my position was leaning towards view that the warmists were wrong. This video is moving me back towards a neutral position. I still however do have the view that apart from the addition of sunlight and the occasional meteorite the earth is a closed system that will always move to a position of stasis. Consequently even if the earth is warming it may or may not be anything to do with human intervention and regardless of that the potential effects of what may happen have been blown out of all proportion to what will actually happen.
Recently I got into a conversation with some teenagers who were convinced that if we did not do 'something' (very vague on what that something should be though and certainly not something that should change their own personal life style at all) then we would all face a 'Day after tomorrow' scenario soon.
And this is the problem as I see it. Virtually every natural disaster is put down to 'climate change' from Katrina (which was a humans being in the wrong place and poor engineering problem) to droughts being declared in one of the wettest places in the world (because the water companies allow so much leakage from their pipes problem).
And Politicians use this as an immediate cop-out for their f**k ups. Nothing to do with us buddy it's climate change.
No, I'm sorry, but the real problem is that laymen like us use this "both sides" political and media debate inappropriately. When it comes to a scientific issue like this, the only rational move is to accept the scientific consensus.
The scientific method is the best way we've ever discovered of determining the truth. It's not perfect, but nothing else even comes close. So choosing to believe anything other than the scientific consensus, on any scientific issue, is just believing what you want to believe.
Climatologists have the education, the experience, and the tools - and the time - to actually look at the data and the arguments. As a layman, I can't tell when a plausible-sounding scientific argument is nonsensical. (I've seen that sort of thing many, many times from opponents of evolution, another issue where many people foolishly refuse to accept the scientific consensus.)
Of course, what any individual climatologist says is immaterial. Choosing to believe a particular climatologist over another is, again, just believing what you want to believe. Global warming deniers trot out scientists of their own (often not even climatologists), but you can always find someone to back up your own position, no matter what it is - especially if there's money or prestige on the line.
And scientists are only human, so there will always be disagreement among them. But so what? For us laymen, the only rational position here is to accept the consensus of climatologists, and that's overwhelmingly that global warming is real and at least partially - and probably largely - man-made.
I'm with those teenagers on this. No, you can't blame climate change for every natural disaster, but you can't say they weren't caused by global warming, either. That's not how it works. We've always had natural disasters and always will, but that doesn't mean global warming won't influence their number and their destructive power.
And politicians using global warming as a cop out? Heh, heh. Not in America. In America, half the politicians don't accept the scientific consensus at all, because it's unpopular (and because actually doing something about it would be even more unpopular).
The scientific consensus can always be wrong, but that's never the smart bet. And if it is wrong, climatologists will be the first to discover that, and the consensus will change. If that happens, my position will change right along with it. But right now, choosing to believe anything else is just clinging to what you really want to believe.
I'm a skeptic. I think it makes sense to have reasons for what I believe, so I apportion my belief to the evidence. You're welcome to disagree. Please, tell me I'm wrong. I probably don't agree with anyone about everything. Why should disagreement be a problem? Check the Pages section below for series posts and links to book reviews and game posts, as well as contact info. Unfortunately, I rarely blog at all, anymore. So don't expect new posts. - Bill
We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true. - Robert Wilensky
It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong - Richard Feynman
The general root of superstition is that men observe when things hit, and not when they miss, and commit to memory the one, and pass over the other. - Sir Francis Bacon
When a whole nation is roaring Patriotism at the top of its voice, I am fain to explore the cleanness of its hands and purity of its heart. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Speculation is perfectly all right, but if you stay there you've only founded a superstition. If you test it, you've started a science. - Hal Clement
No matter how many times a theory meets its tests successfully, there can be no certainty that it will not be overthrown by the next observation. This, then, is a cornerstone of modern natural philosophy. It makes no claim of attaining ultimate truth. In fact, the phrase "ultimate truth" becomes meaningless, because there is no way in which enough observations can be made to make truth certain and, therefore, "ultimate". - Isaac Asimov
The government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion. - Treaty of Tripoli, passed unanimously by the U.S. Senate and signed by President John Adams (1797)
I don't doubt the sincerity of dowsers, but even after we've demonstrated that they can't produce results that are any better than chance they'll still go away believing in their abilities... It is like the mother whose son is caught shoplifting on tape. She wonders why someone would want to frame her child by producing a fake video. - James Randi
During many ages there were witches. The Bible said so. The Bible commanded that they should not be allowed to live. Therefore the Church ... imprisoned, tortured, hanged, and burned whole hordes and armies of witches, and washed the Christian world clean with their foul blood. Then it was discovered that there was no such thing as witches, and never had been. One does not know whether to laugh or to cry. - Mark Twain
Aristotle maintained that women have fewer teeth than men; although he was twice married, it never occurred to him to verify this statement by examining his wives' mouths. - Bertrand Russell
A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything. - Friedrich Nietzsche
I have been thinking that I would make a proposition to my Republican friends... that if they will stop telling lies about the Democrats, we will stop telling the truth about them. - Adlai E. Stevenson, Jr.
This is not about proof. Science does not use proof. We favor evidence, and the work consists largely of the slow accumulation of evidence in support of ideas, not magically potent proofs that establish an idea as unassailable. - PZ Myers
No, people don't expect government to solve all their problems. But they sense, deep in their bones, that with just a slight change in priorities, we can make sure that every child in America has a decent shot at life, and that the doors of opportunity remain open to all. - President Barack Obama
The formula was very simple: build this really flexible, really open economy, tolerate creative destruction so dead capital is quickly redeployed to better ideas and companies, pour into it the most diverse, smart and energetic immigrants from every corner of the world and then stir and repeat, stir and repeat, stir and repeat, stir and repeat. - Shekhar Gupta
We are prodding, challenging, seeking contradictions or small, persistent residual errors, proposing alternative explanations, encouraging heresy. We give our highest rewards to those who convincingly disprove established beliefs. - Carl Sagan
We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further. - Richard Dawkins
120 million of us place the big bang 2,500 years after the Babylonians and Sumerians learned to brew beer. - Sam Harris
To kill a man is not to defend a doctrine, but to kill a man. - Michael Servetus, burned at the stake in 1553
Democracy is not about majority rule; it is about minority rights. If there is no culture of not simply tolerating minorities, but actually treating them with equal rights, real democracy can't take root. - Thomas L. Friedman
We cannot absolutely prove that those are in error who tell us that society has reached a turning point, that we have seen our best days. But so said all who came before us and with just as much apparent reason. - Thomas Macauley, 1830
It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me, but it can stop him from lynching me, and I think that's pretty important. - Martin Luther King, Jr.
We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven into an age of unreason if we dig deep into our history and remember we are not descended from fearful men. - Edward R. Murrow
The deepest sin against the human mind is to believe things without evidence. Science is simply common sense at its best - that is, rigidly accurate in observation, and merciless to fallacy in logic. - Thomas Huxley
There is no absurdity so obvious that it cannot be firmly planted in the human head if you only begin to impose it before the age of five, by constantly repeating it with an air of great solemnity. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Because religious belief, or non-belief, is such an important part of every person's life, freedom of religion affects every individual. ... Erecting the "wall of separation between church and state," therefore, is absolutely essential in a free society. - President Thomas Jefferson
To be elected in America, no matter from what party, the candidates have no choice but to year after year pledge to lower taxes further and further. We have become the nation of Ken and Barbie, looking good but very poor at the math. - Rack Jite
Invisible Pink Unicorns are beings of great spiritual power. We know this because they are capable of being invisible and pink at the same time. Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them. - Steve Eley
We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics. - President Franklin D. Roosevelt
I have been attacked by Rush Limbaugh on the air, an experience somewhat akin to being gummed by a newt. It doesn't actually hurt, but it leaves you with slimy stuff on your ankle. - Molly Ivins
In this world of sin and sorrow there is always something to be thankful for; as for me, I rejoice that I am not a Republican. - H. L. Mencken
Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts. - Winston Churchill
Interview About Hal Clement
-
*Science Fiction Book Club*
*Interview with Paul Levinson (October 2024)*
*Our expert is Paul Levinson, a writer, singer-songwriter, and professor ...
Old Man vs. Front Lawn (Round 2)
-
by James Wallace Harris, 10/25/24 Like I said in the first round, I don’t
care about having a perfect lawn. I’m using converting my front lawn from
mostly ...
The SFF Blog
-
To all readers of my blog: I have decided that this will be my final post.
Not that I am about to expire in the near future (I hope) but I have become ...
Death!
-
Like nearly two thirds of Americans, as a young man I was in favor of the
death penalty. Since I lived in Nebraska, that was an easy position to
take - on...
Posts
2 comments:
A very well thought out and well presented argument. I confess that due to the amount of information/misinformation being spread on both sides my position was leaning towards view that the warmists were wrong. This video is moving me back towards a neutral position. I still however do have the view that apart from the addition of sunlight and the occasional meteorite the earth is a closed system that will always move to a position of stasis. Consequently even if the earth is warming it may or may not be anything to do with human intervention and regardless of that the potential effects of what may happen have been blown out of all proportion to what will actually happen.
Recently I got into a conversation with some teenagers who were convinced that if we did not do 'something' (very vague on what that something should be though and certainly not something that should change their own personal life style at all) then we would all face a 'Day after tomorrow' scenario soon.
And this is the problem as I see it. Virtually every natural disaster is put down to 'climate change' from Katrina (which was a humans being in the wrong place and poor engineering problem) to droughts being declared in one of the wettest places in the world (because the water companies allow so much leakage from their pipes problem).
And Politicians use this as an immediate cop-out for their f**k ups. Nothing to do with us buddy it's climate change.
No, I'm sorry, but the real problem is that laymen like us use this "both sides" political and media debate inappropriately. When it comes to a scientific issue like this, the only rational move is to accept the scientific consensus.
The scientific method is the best way we've ever discovered of determining the truth. It's not perfect, but nothing else even comes close. So choosing to believe anything other than the scientific consensus, on any scientific issue, is just believing what you want to believe.
Climatologists have the education, the experience, and the tools - and the time - to actually look at the data and the arguments. As a layman, I can't tell when a plausible-sounding scientific argument is nonsensical. (I've seen that sort of thing many, many times from opponents of evolution, another issue where many people foolishly refuse to accept the scientific consensus.)
Of course, what any individual climatologist says is immaterial. Choosing to believe a particular climatologist over another is, again, just believing what you want to believe. Global warming deniers trot out scientists of their own (often not even climatologists), but you can always find someone to back up your own position, no matter what it is - especially if there's money or prestige on the line.
And scientists are only human, so there will always be disagreement among them. But so what? For us laymen, the only rational position here is to accept the consensus of climatologists, and that's overwhelmingly that global warming is real and at least partially - and probably largely - man-made.
I'm with those teenagers on this. No, you can't blame climate change for every natural disaster, but you can't say they weren't caused by global warming, either. That's not how it works. We've always had natural disasters and always will, but that doesn't mean global warming won't influence their number and their destructive power.
And politicians using global warming as a cop out? Heh, heh. Not in America. In America, half the politicians don't accept the scientific consensus at all, because it's unpopular (and because actually doing something about it would be even more unpopular).
The scientific consensus can always be wrong, but that's never the smart bet. And if it is wrong, climatologists will be the first to discover that, and the consensus will change. If that happens, my position will change right along with it. But right now, choosing to believe anything else is just clinging to what you really want to believe.
Post a Comment