Well, all this is interesting to me, anyway, and that's what matters here. The Internet is a terrible thing for someone like me, who finds almost everything interesting.
Friday, November 23, 2012
Rebecca Watson at Skepticon 5: How girls evolved to shop
Rebecca Watson is a great speaker, perceptive and very funny. But she takes a lot of crap from misogynists online. You should see some of the comments she gets.
And yes, some of them are apparently from atheists (men, naturally - usually those loony "men's rights" activists). Well, being an atheist doesn't make you rational. (It's the other way around. Being rational tends to make you an atheist - if you can struggle past your upbringing, at least.)
If you check out the other videos from Skepticon 5, they hardly have any negative ratings at all. But more than a third of the ratings on this talk are negative, and the comments seem to be more negative even than that.
Now, you can dislike a video for many reasons. I have no problem with that. Still, what's really to dislike about this one? And this is absolutely typical of any video clip featuring Rebecca Watson. Her detractors really seem to search them out.
And with some of those,... well, the comments are really bad. Her atheism is OK, apparently, but her feminism seems to enrage some men (boys?).
Weird, isn't it? But if you expect the world to be black and white, you'll be very disappointed. Atheists can be just as irrational as anyone else. (But note that not all misogynists are atheists, and those atheists who're also misogynists are a small minority.)
Anyway, that said, I'm not posting this to support Rebecca Watson. I'm posting it because it's an excellent talk - perceptive, eloquent, and quite funny. But maybe you can understand why the haters hate. She's very good at ridiculing the ridiculous.
No, I really doubt it, David. After all, how many people actually get worked up at dissing evolutionary psychology?
I don't know anything about the field, myself, though I've heard scientists criticize it. Of course, in print, they're usually careful to say they're not implying that everything in evolutionary psychology is bullshit.
As I say, I don't know anything about it, myself. But I wouldn't expect a humorous sort of talk like this to be particularly balanced - or to be overly concerned about stepping on sensitive toes.
Certainly, Rebecca Watson isn't above criticism, and I wouldn't expect evolutionary psychologists to be her biggest fans. But equally clearly, that's not what's driving the hate. I don't think there are enough evolutionary psychologists in the world to explain that, not to mention that they'd probably (hopefully) express themselves better.
Thanks for the link (and the comment). I just skimmed it, since I really have no interest in evolutionary psychology. I read most of the comments, though, which are more informative than some of the commenters might wish. The post seems to be an excellent example of reasonable criticism, but that's not the kind of response Watson has been facing, not overall.
So there are two issues here. One is about evolutionary psychology, which seems to get some legitimate criticism, but which I have neither the ability nor the desire to judge, myself.
The other is about vicious attacks on Rebecca Watson as a 'feminist.' Now, there are perfectly reasonable ways to criticize Watson - to criticize anyone, in fact - but that's not what I generally see online. IMHO, that's what seems to be driving the hate, not evolutionary psychology.
No WCG. The reason people would get upset at Watson for this speech is because she sounds like a Creationist at a conference devoted to skepticism. She fallaciously attacks a scientific field to support her views.
I don't think so, Dimitri. There's more going on than that. Unfortunately, there seem to be some lunatic "Men's Rights Activists" in the atheist community, people who get upset when women don't know their place.
As an atheist man, I find that really embarrassing. I thought we were better than that!
Now, I've been seeing other criticism of evolutionary psychology (at Pharyngula, for example). In the last month, I've also seen a detailed critique of that post in David's comment above, too. (Unfortunately, I lost the link, so I can't post that here.)
As I noted earlier, I don't know anything about evolutionary psychology myself. Since he's an evolutionary biologist, I imagine that PZ Myers knows what he's talking about, but I see no reason to take sides.
And as I say, I've seen a detailed rebuttal of Edward Clint's post, which was at least as thorough and convincing as his comments.
But, of course, I'm a layman who doesn't even pretend to know anything about the field of evolutionary psychology, so how would I know? I'm certainly not going to take sides in that debate.
The criticism of Rebecca Watson, though, seems to go far beyond that. Do you read the comments people (men) make? Clint might be right or he might not, but either way, that's not what's really driving the attacks on Watson.
Did you listen to her talk? I thought it was hilarious. Now, if you're an evolutionary psychologist yourself, you might be unhappy with it. But if not, I have to wonder if you're just using that excuse to attack Watson.
I mean, who would really get upset at attacks on evolutionary psychology, even if they weren't valid? There aren't enough evolutionary psychologists in the world to cause that kind of uproar!
And if you're like me, a layman in the field, why wouldn't you simply reserve judgment about evolutionary psychology, as I do? Why would you think you know enough about it?
Sorry, but the whole thing stinks. Evolutionary psychologists might have reason to be unhappy with Rebecca Watson, I don't know. But there's a lot more than that going on here!
I'm a skeptic. I think it makes sense to have reasons for what I believe, so I apportion my belief to the evidence. You're welcome to disagree. Please, tell me I'm wrong. I probably don't agree with anyone about everything. Why should disagreement be a problem? Check the Pages section below for series posts and links to book reviews and game posts, as well as contact info. Unfortunately, I rarely blog at all, anymore. So don't expect new posts. - Bill
We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true. - Robert Wilensky
It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong - Richard Feynman
The general root of superstition is that men observe when things hit, and not when they miss, and commit to memory the one, and pass over the other. - Sir Francis Bacon
When a whole nation is roaring Patriotism at the top of its voice, I am fain to explore the cleanness of its hands and purity of its heart. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Speculation is perfectly all right, but if you stay there you've only founded a superstition. If you test it, you've started a science. - Hal Clement
No matter how many times a theory meets its tests successfully, there can be no certainty that it will not be overthrown by the next observation. This, then, is a cornerstone of modern natural philosophy. It makes no claim of attaining ultimate truth. In fact, the phrase "ultimate truth" becomes meaningless, because there is no way in which enough observations can be made to make truth certain and, therefore, "ultimate". - Isaac Asimov
The government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion. - Treaty of Tripoli, passed unanimously by the U.S. Senate and signed by President John Adams (1797)
I don't doubt the sincerity of dowsers, but even after we've demonstrated that they can't produce results that are any better than chance they'll still go away believing in their abilities... It is like the mother whose son is caught shoplifting on tape. She wonders why someone would want to frame her child by producing a fake video. - James Randi
During many ages there were witches. The Bible said so. The Bible commanded that they should not be allowed to live. Therefore the Church ... imprisoned, tortured, hanged, and burned whole hordes and armies of witches, and washed the Christian world clean with their foul blood. Then it was discovered that there was no such thing as witches, and never had been. One does not know whether to laugh or to cry. - Mark Twain
Aristotle maintained that women have fewer teeth than men; although he was twice married, it never occurred to him to verify this statement by examining his wives' mouths. - Bertrand Russell
A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything. - Friedrich Nietzsche
I have been thinking that I would make a proposition to my Republican friends... that if they will stop telling lies about the Democrats, we will stop telling the truth about them. - Adlai E. Stevenson, Jr.
This is not about proof. Science does not use proof. We favor evidence, and the work consists largely of the slow accumulation of evidence in support of ideas, not magically potent proofs that establish an idea as unassailable. - PZ Myers
No, people don't expect government to solve all their problems. But they sense, deep in their bones, that with just a slight change in priorities, we can make sure that every child in America has a decent shot at life, and that the doors of opportunity remain open to all. - President Barack Obama
The formula was very simple: build this really flexible, really open economy, tolerate creative destruction so dead capital is quickly redeployed to better ideas and companies, pour into it the most diverse, smart and energetic immigrants from every corner of the world and then stir and repeat, stir and repeat, stir and repeat, stir and repeat. - Shekhar Gupta
We are prodding, challenging, seeking contradictions or small, persistent residual errors, proposing alternative explanations, encouraging heresy. We give our highest rewards to those who convincingly disprove established beliefs. - Carl Sagan
We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further. - Richard Dawkins
120 million of us place the big bang 2,500 years after the Babylonians and Sumerians learned to brew beer. - Sam Harris
To kill a man is not to defend a doctrine, but to kill a man. - Michael Servetus, burned at the stake in 1553
Democracy is not about majority rule; it is about minority rights. If there is no culture of not simply tolerating minorities, but actually treating them with equal rights, real democracy can't take root. - Thomas L. Friedman
We cannot absolutely prove that those are in error who tell us that society has reached a turning point, that we have seen our best days. But so said all who came before us and with just as much apparent reason. - Thomas Macauley, 1830
It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me, but it can stop him from lynching me, and I think that's pretty important. - Martin Luther King, Jr.
We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven into an age of unreason if we dig deep into our history and remember we are not descended from fearful men. - Edward R. Murrow
The deepest sin against the human mind is to believe things without evidence. Science is simply common sense at its best - that is, rigidly accurate in observation, and merciless to fallacy in logic. - Thomas Huxley
There is no absurdity so obvious that it cannot be firmly planted in the human head if you only begin to impose it before the age of five, by constantly repeating it with an air of great solemnity. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Because religious belief, or non-belief, is such an important part of every person's life, freedom of religion affects every individual. ... Erecting the "wall of separation between church and state," therefore, is absolutely essential in a free society. - President Thomas Jefferson
To be elected in America, no matter from what party, the candidates have no choice but to year after year pledge to lower taxes further and further. We have become the nation of Ken and Barbie, looking good but very poor at the math. - Rack Jite
Invisible Pink Unicorns are beings of great spiritual power. We know this because they are capable of being invisible and pink at the same time. Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them. - Steve Eley
We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics. - President Franklin D. Roosevelt
I have been attacked by Rush Limbaugh on the air, an experience somewhat akin to being gummed by a newt. It doesn't actually hurt, but it leaves you with slimy stuff on your ankle. - Molly Ivins
In this world of sin and sorrow there is always something to be thankful for; as for me, I rejoice that I am not a Republican. - H. L. Mencken
Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts. - Winston Churchill
Interview About Hal Clement
-
*Science Fiction Book Club*
*Interview with Paul Levinson (October 2024)*
*Our expert is Paul Levinson, a writer, singer-songwriter, and professor ...
Old Man vs. Front Lawn (Round 2)
-
by James Wallace Harris, 10/25/24 Like I said in the first round, I don’t
care about having a perfect lawn. I’m using converting my front lawn from
mostly ...
The SFF Blog
-
To all readers of my blog: I have decided that this will be my final post.
Not that I am about to expire in the near future (I hope) but I have become ...
Death!
-
Like nearly two thirds of Americans, as a young man I was in favor of the
death penalty. Since I lived in Nebraska, that was an easy position to
take - on...
Posts
4 comments:
Perhaps this is why?
http://skepticink.com/incredulous/2012/12/01/science-denialism-at-a-skeptic-conference
No, I really doubt it, David. After all, how many people actually get worked up at dissing evolutionary psychology?
I don't know anything about the field, myself, though I've heard scientists criticize it. Of course, in print, they're usually careful to say they're not implying that everything in evolutionary psychology is bullshit.
As I say, I don't know anything about it, myself. But I wouldn't expect a humorous sort of talk like this to be particularly balanced - or to be overly concerned about stepping on sensitive toes.
Certainly, Rebecca Watson isn't above criticism, and I wouldn't expect evolutionary psychologists to be her biggest fans. But equally clearly, that's not what's driving the hate. I don't think there are enough evolutionary psychologists in the world to explain that, not to mention that they'd probably (hopefully) express themselves better.
Thanks for the link (and the comment). I just skimmed it, since I really have no interest in evolutionary psychology. I read most of the comments, though, which are more informative than some of the commenters might wish. The post seems to be an excellent example of reasonable criticism, but that's not the kind of response Watson has been facing, not overall.
So there are two issues here. One is about evolutionary psychology, which seems to get some legitimate criticism, but which I have neither the ability nor the desire to judge, myself.
The other is about vicious attacks on Rebecca Watson as a 'feminist.' Now, there are perfectly reasonable ways to criticize Watson - to criticize anyone, in fact - but that's not what I generally see online. IMHO, that's what seems to be driving the hate, not evolutionary psychology.
No WCG. The reason people would get upset at Watson for this speech is because she sounds like a Creationist at a conference devoted to skepticism. She fallaciously attacks a scientific field to support her views.
I don't think so, Dimitri. There's more going on than that. Unfortunately, there seem to be some lunatic "Men's Rights Activists" in the atheist community, people who get upset when women don't know their place.
As an atheist man, I find that really embarrassing. I thought we were better than that!
Now, I've been seeing other criticism of evolutionary psychology (at Pharyngula, for example). In the last month, I've also seen a detailed critique of that post in David's comment above, too. (Unfortunately, I lost the link, so I can't post that here.)
As I noted earlier, I don't know anything about evolutionary psychology myself. Since he's an evolutionary biologist, I imagine that PZ Myers knows what he's talking about, but I see no reason to take sides.
And as I say, I've seen a detailed rebuttal of Edward Clint's post, which was at least as thorough and convincing as his comments.
But, of course, I'm a layman who doesn't even pretend to know anything about the field of evolutionary psychology, so how would I know? I'm certainly not going to take sides in that debate.
The criticism of Rebecca Watson, though, seems to go far beyond that. Do you read the comments people (men) make? Clint might be right or he might not, but either way, that's not what's really driving the attacks on Watson.
Did you listen to her talk? I thought it was hilarious. Now, if you're an evolutionary psychologist yourself, you might be unhappy with it. But if not, I have to wonder if you're just using that excuse to attack Watson.
I mean, who would really get upset at attacks on evolutionary psychology, even if they weren't valid? There aren't enough evolutionary psychologists in the world to cause that kind of uproar!
And if you're like me, a layman in the field, why wouldn't you simply reserve judgment about evolutionary psychology, as I do? Why would you think you know enough about it?
Sorry, but the whole thing stinks. Evolutionary psychologists might have reason to be unhappy with Rebecca Watson, I don't know. But there's a lot more than that going on here!
Post a Comment